The Thirty-Four We Cannot See: The Visibility Gap Inside the Senate's UHS Investigation
Updated: Sep 9
The Senate looked at fifty-nine UHS residential facilities. That number matters. But the part I cannot stop looking at is what the Senate could not see equally across all fifty-nine.
In its 2024 report, Warehouses of Neglect, the Senate Finance Committee described a sweeping investigation into residential treatment facilities operated by Universal Health Services, Acadia Healthcare, Devereux Advanced Behavioral Health and Vivant Behavioral Healthcare. The Committee says it reviewed more than twenty-five thousand pages of company productions, spoke with behavioral-health stakeholders and visited facilities on the ground.
The report is not vague about what the Committee found across the residential-treatment model. It describes routine harm, inappropriate restraint and seclusion, inadequate treatment, staffing failures, unsafe conditions and oversight systems that repeatedly fail to identify and correct harm.
For UHS specifically, the Committee received anonymized facility data on overall incidents and restraint and seclusion rates from 2018 through 2022. The report says that in 2022, thirty-five of fifty-nine UHS facilities had double-digit restraint rates per one thousand patient days. The highest rate was 78.92.
There is important context in the same section. Thirty-six of the fifty-nine facilities saw restraint use decrease between 2018 and 2022. Sixty percent had zero seclusion incidents in 2022. And the Committee cautioned that the field lacks established benchmarks that would allow clean comparisons between facilities.
That context does not weaken the investigation. It makes the next problem clearer.
Elsewhere in the report, the Committee states that UHS produced incident reporting for only twenty-five of its fifty-nine facilities under its agreement with the Committee.
Fifty-nine facilities in the broader UHS dataset. Incident reporting produced for twenty-five.
The mathematical remainder is thirty-four.
What happened inside those thirty-four facilities?
Right now, the correct answer is not “nothing.” It is not “abuse.” The correct answer is that the Senate did not receive the same incident-reporting production for them.
And that is exactly the kind of gap an accountability investigation is supposed to follow.
Residential treatment facilities receive children through families, clinicians, child-welfare agencies, juvenile-justice systems and educational systems. The Senate report also explains that many placements are supported by Medicaid and federal child-welfare funding and that providers are paid per diems for children in their care.
If public systems are placing children and public dollars are paying for the care, then the public should not have to infer safety from missing records.
So Wonder Haven's next step is not to label the thirty-four. It is to find them.
We are looking for facility-level incident records, licensing histories, corrective-action plans, restraint and seclusion data, serious-incident reports, payer records, accreditation findings and records showing what regulators knew, when they knew it and what happened next.
The strongest investigation is not the one that makes the biggest accusation.
It is the one that can show you the record.
And where the record is missing, it can show you the hole.
What I think
A report that documents harm while leaving thirty-four facilities outside public view is not a complete accountability story. It is a partial window presented to a public that has no way to see what remains behind the wall. Families are expected to trust the investigation without being allowed to examine its full reach.
When children are sent hundreds or thousands of miles from home, secrecy and fragmentation are not administrative quirks. They are conditions that make harm easier to miss and harder to trace. Every unnamed facility, unexplained exclusion, and unpublished follow-up becomes another place for responsibility to disappear.
I am not satisfied by the words “under investigation.” I want names, methods, outcomes, and proof that documented harm changed what happened next. Anything less risks becoming paperwork performing accountability.
Sources reviewed
U.S. Senate Committee on Finance, Warehouses of Neglect (2024).
About this investigation
Wonder Haven follows public records, court decisions, regulatory actions, payment systems, and the gaps between them. Documented facts are separated from analysis, and unresolved questions remain labeled as unresolved.
Wonder Haven disclaimer
Wonder Haven Autism Advocacy provides educational information and practical support. We are not medical doctors, licensed mental health professionals, therapists, or diagnosticians. This material is not medical advice, mental health treatment, therapy, diagnosis, or a substitute for individualized care from a qualified professional.
This article discusses public records, government systems, disability rights, and accountability. It is not legal advice and does not replace advice from a qualified attorney, advocate, or other professional about an individual situation.
Comments